|  
  
  
  Yrsas Blogg
 * Artiklar på engelska
  * Tsunami
 * 
        9/11
 * 
        Bilderbergare
 * 
        Frimurare och illuminater
 * Nya Världsordningen
 * Israel och Palestina
 * Kriget i Irak
 * USA
 * Balibombningen
 * Estonia
 * Mordet på Anna Lindh
 * Mordet på Olof Palme
 * Medicin och hälsa
 * MindControl
 * Chemtrail
 *HAARP & Echelon
 * EU
 * Böcker
 * Video
 
 
  
   
 
 
 
 | 20.5.2007
 Med Leif Erlingssons kommentarer
 
 
 Men det begriper du väl, Camilla, att Blair är God på samma sätt som Adolf   Hitler är God(*) - båda drevs av en absolut inre kompass och övertygelse, som   inga triviala rationella fakta och
 motargument förmådde rubba! (*: Brasklapp:   Jag tror inte själv på detta, det är grovt ironiskt. Hitler drevs förvisso av   inre övertygelse och han trodde förvisso att han gjorde det rätta,
 men det   gör inte resultatet av hans verksamhet till något gott.)
 
 
 On Fri, 18   May 2007, Camilla Ingman-Fulton wrote:
 Date Fri, 18 May 2007 10:41 AM
 >From "Camilla   Ingman-Fulton" <camingfult01@fastmail.fm>
 To ekot@sr.se
 Cc studioett@sr.se, gmv@sr.se, konflikt@sr.se, maria.eksedler@sr.se
 Subject De Goda   Britternas aktiviteter i Irak: forced disappearances,
 hostage-taking and   torture
 
 Listan på Blairs brott är oändlig och det han borde "göra", nu   efter premiärministerpensioneringen, är att sitta inspärrad på livstid.   Detta är, eller borde vara, självklart. Men i Ekot och   dess
 "fördjupningsprogram" Studioett och gmv nuddar man inte ens i   frågan. Istället surras det på om allt möjligt annat. Allt utom det som   borde klargöras: att Blair är Europas största brottsling.
 Ansvarig för   det värsta brott som kan begås; startandet av ett aggressionskrig, dvs   brott mot freden, oräkneliga krigsförbrytelser, brott mot de   mänskliga rättigheterna, brott mot en mängd internationella lagar/regler,   ansvarig för upp till 1 miljon människors död de senaste fyra åren, dvs   ett gigantiskt massmord, dvs brott mot mänskligheten, ansvarig för   många fler skadade, ansvarig för att flera miljoner befinner sig på   flykt, totalförstörelsen av ett helt land......
 
 Men enligt Ekots   sagoberättelse, tror ni på det själva?, så är Blair God, han drivs av en   moralisk övertygelse att förbättra världen, och detta var anledningen till   att han startade detta aggressionskrig. Målet är Gott! Halleluja! Så exemplen   i artikeln nedan är bara olycksfall i det Goda Arbetet, och har förstås NOLL   betydelse för Ekots fortsatta sagoberättelse, liksom ingenting annat om   aktiviteterna i Irak de senaste fyra åren haft någon som helst   betydelse. Att beskrivningen av och diskussionen om denne man låter som den   gör i Ekot, är en skandal i den större skandalen. I framtiden kommer domen   att vara hård mot de som agerat som taltrattar för de som startat   detta
 Eviga Krig som är tänkt att vara i generationer. Precis som domen   föll hårt mot de som agerade likadant gentemot   Hitler.
 
 Camilla
 
 
 
 Kidnap and torture: new claims of Army war   crimes in Iraq
 
 Robert Verkaik reveals evidence of systemic ill-treatment   of civilians
 by British soldiers in the aftermath of the overthrow of   Saddam
 Published: 18 May 2007
 http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/legal/article2556468.ece
 
 The   British Army is facing new allegations that it was involved in "forced   disappearances", hostage-taking and torture of Iraqi civilians after the fall   of the regime of Saddam Hussein.
 
 One of the claims is made by the former   chairman of the Red Crescent in Basra, who alleges he was beaten unconscious   by British soldiers after they accused him of being a senior official in   Saddam's Baath party.
 
 The family of another Iraqi civilian claims he was   arrested and kidnapped by the British in order to secure the surrender of   his brother, who was also accused of being a high-ranking member of   the
 party. He was later found shot dead, still handcuffed and wearing a   UK prisoner name tag.
 
 Both cases are being prepared for hearings in   the High Court in which the Government will be accused of war crimes while   carrying out the arrest and detention of alleged senior members of the Baath   party.
 
 Last month, the first British soldier to be convicted of a war   crime was jailed for a year and dismissed from the Army after being convicted   of mistreating Iraqi civilians, including the hotel worker Baha Mousa,   who died of his injuries at the hands of British soldiers. Six   other
 soldiers, including Col Jorge Mendonca, were cleared of all   charges.
 
 Lawyers and rights groups say the worrying aspect of these   latest allegations is that they show evidence of systemic abuse by   British soldiers soon after the fall of Saddam.
 
 Fouad Awdah   Al-Saadoon, 67, chairman of the Iraqi Red Crescent in Basra, alleges he was   visited by British soldiers at his offices in the city on 12 April 2003 and   was taken to the British base at the former Mukhabarat [intelligence]   building. In his witness statement, Mr Saadoon said he was accused of being a   member of the Baath party and of using his organisation's ambulances secretly   to transport Iraqi militia.
 
 In a detailed account of the abuse that he   alleges he suffered, Mr Saadoon recalls: "As soon as I went inside they   started beating me. They used electric cables and wooden batons and they   harshly punched me with their hands and boots. I had a heart problem, I was a   diabetic and had
 high blood pressure. I was hit repeatedly on my eyes which   made me collapse unconscious."
 
 Mr Saadoon was later transferred to the   joint American/British-run detention centre called Camp Bucca, in southern   Iraq, which the British had set up to process prisoners at the start of the   war. He was interrogated for five days. Because of the injuries sustained   during the beatings his condition worsened and he claims the British flew him   to Kuwait for a heart operation. There he claims he was visited by   the International Federation of the Red Crescent whose   representatives
 expressed concern at his alleged treatment by the   British.
 
 In the second case, a 26-year-old Iraqi civilian, Tarek Hassan,   was arrested in a dawn raid by British troops involved in the rounding up   of Baath party officials on 24 April 2003. His family allege he was   held hostage by the British in exchange for the surrender of his   brother, Kadhim Hassan, a member of the Baath party.
 
 Five months after   his arrest, his family received a phone call to say his body had been found   dumped in Samarra, north of Baghdad and 550 miles from the detention centre   where he had been held. Kadhim Hassan, 37, has spent the past three years   trying to establish the circumstances
 that led to the death of his brother.   Now Iraqi human rights workers and British lawyers have uncovered vital   witnesses to his arrest and detention. They have also recovered Tarek's UK   identity tag, which indicates he was a British prisoner.
 
 In his   witness statement, Kadhim recalls the night his bother was arrested. "The   British were looking for me as I was a high-ranking member of the Baath   party," he said. "I suspect that a financial dispute with one of my   neighbours made him inform the British of my rank and he possibly told them   some lies which made them look for me." Kadhim had left the family a few   hours before the armoured vehicles carrying the soldiers arrived. When his   sisters contacted the British to find out where the British had taken Tarek,   they were told that he would only be released if Kadhim gave himself up. That   was the last they heard of him until five months later.
 
 "He was   found," said Kadhim, "by locals in the countryside ... We went to collect him   from the morgue in Samarra, where we found him with eight bullet wounds to   his chest. They were Kalashnikov bullets. His hands were tied with plastic   wire and had many bruises."
 
 Now it emerges that Mr Saadoon, who has left   Iraq and is working as a businessman in Dubai, met Tarek shortly after he was   flown back to Camp Bucca from Kuwait, where he had been receiving medical   care.
 
 "I was brought back to Camp Bucca in a van on 21 April and placed   in a tent, which held 400 prisoners. On 24 April Tarek Hassan was brought   to our tent. He was very scared and confused. He told me British troops   had raided his house and were looking for his brother who left the   house
 before the soldiers had arrived. As I was in bad health, Tarek used   to bring me food and care for me. Tarek was never interrogated while I   was at Camp Bucca."
 
 On 27 April the International Federation of the   Red Crescent requested the British to free Mr Saadoon and that night he and   all 200 others were released in the middle of the night on the highway   between Basra and Zubai. "We had to walk 25 miles to reach the nearest place   where we
 could hire cars," remembers Mr Saadoon.
 
 The Government denies   being involved in the injuries suffered by Mr Saadoon or responsibility for   Tarek's death. In letters to the family, the Ministry of Defence makes the   point that the bullets that may have killed him were fired from a Kalashnikov   weapon and that the area where his body was found was not an area of   operations associated with British forces.
 
 But the Hassan family's   solicitor, Phil Shiner, of Public Interest Lawyers, said the evidence showed   Tarek disappeared at the hands of UK forces and that the circumstances of his   release "significantly
 increased the risk to his life".
 
 In recent   correspondence, the MoD has admitted to the Hassan family that Tarek was held   at Camp Bucca but claims that it is a US-run camp and so not the   responsibility of the British.
 
 Mr Shiner, who is acting in both cases,   said: "The Government deny any responsibility in a case where a man has been   kidnapped by UK forces and killed. It is a matter of public record that our   agents were torturing Iraqis at Camp Bucca and continued to hand over   detainees to the Iraqi
 criminal system even though there was a serious risk   of torture or death in detention. This case is important because if the UK   have jurisdiction it cannot allow these incidents to continue and must   properly investigate previous incidents".
 
 Mazin Younis, chair of the   Iraqi League, a UK-based rights group, said: "The cases we have reported so   far may only be the tip of an iceberg of systematic abuse procedures devised   high up the command chain in the Army. The scale of such cases greatly   necessitates the need for the
 Government to start a public   inquiry."
 
 Camp Bucca, a 'holding facility' with a history of   allegations
 
 The secure holding facility in the desert near the city of   Umm Qasr, close to the Kuwaiti border, was originally called Camp Freddy and   used by British forces to hold Iraqi prisoners of war.
 
 But in April   2003 control of the camp was transferred to the Americans, although there was   a "secure and discrete" unit within the camp that remained exclusively   British. In 2003 the British had control of two tent compounds, holding   roughly 400 prisoners each. The Americans had
 six similar   compounds.
 
 The camp is designed to hold between 2,000 and 2,500 prisoners   but figures released in March 2006 estimated that it held 8,500   Iraqi detainees.
 
 There have been a number of inquiries into alleged   abusive treatment at the camp, mostly related to the Americans.
 
 In   February 2005 American soldiers killed four detainees and injured six others   to quell a riot in which prisoners were armed with stones.
 
 But the   British have also been accused of abuse, specifically the hooding of   prisoners, which led to concerns being raised with the International   Committee of the Red Cross.
 
 Six of the men detained with Baha Mousa were   later taken to Camp Bucca. Conditions in the camp are known to be primitive,   with open trenches used as lavatories.
 
 The prisoners were forced to   sleep on the desert floor, at risk from scorpions and snakes, and were only   given one blanket at night when temperatures can fall below   zero.
 
 Since May 2003, 27 prisoners have escaped from Camp Bucca, 18 of   whom have been recaptured. A number of attempts at mass escape have   been foiled.
 
 The Ministry of Defence says that apart from two spells   in 2003, Camp Bucca has been run by the Americans.
 
 Soldiers in the   dock
 Camp Breadbasket
 
 On 15 May 2003 the 1st Battalion of the   Royal Regiment of Fusiliers captured Iraqis looting an aid camp in Operation   Ali-Baba. They were detained for a brief period during which they were   beaten, forced to simulate oral and anal sex and suspended from a forklift   truck. Later that month, Fusilier Gary Bartlam, 20, of Tamworth,   Staffordshire, took a film to be developed containing 22 photographs of abuse   taking place. This triggered a lengthy court martial at a British Army   barracks in Osnabruck, Germany. Bartlam pleaded guilty to three charges of   ill treatment of Iraqi prisoners. Cpl Daniel Kenyon, 33, from   Newcastle, denied six charges of abuse. He was convicted of three, cleared of   two charges and the remaining charge was dropped. L/Cpl Mark Cooley,   25, from Newcastle, denied two charges of abuse but was found guilty   of both. L/Cpl Darren Larkin, 30, from Oldham, Greater Manchester,   admitted to one charge of assault but denied another. The second charge   was dropped.
 
 Baha Mousa
 
 The hotel worker and son of an Iraqi   police colonel died on 16 September 2003 while in custody of the Queen's   Lancashire Regiment at a detention centre near Basra. The building had   formerly been the secret service headquarters of Ali Majid (Chemical Ali).   Cpl Donald Payne, 36, became Britain's first convicted war criminal when he   admitted inhumanely treating civilian detainees. Six other soldiers were   cleared by a military court in Bulford, Wiltshire, of abusing Mr Mousa and   other
 detainees.
 
     
         |